Information on Networks conference

July 31, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

From Sinan Aral, at NYU:

We are organizing an exciting workshop on “Information in Networks” in New York September 25-26.

The purpose of the workshop is to bring together leading researchers studying information in networks from different perspectives in order to lay the foundation for ongoing relationships and to build a multidisciplinary research community. Speakers will share their recent research, which may have been published elsewhere, but which may not be widely known outside of their own disciplines. As the workshop is intended to facilitate interaction, the program will include substantial time for discussion. We hope the energy of New York City will inspire the gathering, and that our participants will leave with new ideas and a stronger sense of community.

Confirmed Participants as of July 1, 2009 include:

Lada Adamic, University of Michigan
Ron Burt, University of Chicago
Damon Centola, MIT
Pedro Domingos, U Wash
Christos Faloutsos, Carnegie Mellon
James Fowler, UCSD
Bernardo Huberman, HP Labs
Matt Jackson, Stanford
Michael Kearns, U Penn
Jon Kleinberg, Cornell
David Lazer, Harvard
Jure Leskovic, Stanford
Michael Macy, Cornell
Sandy Pentland, MIT
Duncan Watts, Yahoo! Research

We’d like to invite you to submit your work. A Call for Participation with more details is attached. Feel free to forward the call to any colleagues or graduate students you think would be interested in submitting and attending.

Please let us know if we can answer any questions and please cc Shirley Lau (info@winworkshop.net) on any correspondence.

We look forward to hearing from you.

Warm regards,

Sinan, Foster and Arun

Sinan Aral
Assistant Professor, NYU Stern School of Business.
Research Affiliate, MIT Sloan School of Management.
Personal Webpage: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~saral
SSRN Page: http://ssrn.com/author=110270

Martin Everett on “Core/Periphery Structures in 2-Mode Data”

June 18, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

LINKS Center Colloquium
Friday, June 19th at 11am in B&E 446

Martin Everett has a master’s degree in mathematics and completed a doctorate on social networks at Oxford University under Clyde Mitchell, one of the pioneers of the subject. He has been an active in social network research for over thirty years and has published over 100 articles mainly on social networks. In 1987 during a sabbatical at the University of California Irvine he teamed up with Steve Borgatti. They have collaborated ever since researching and publishing on methods for social networks, teaching workshops and producing the software program UCINET. Martin has been the president of INSNA the international professional body for social network analysis and still serves on the board; in 2001 he was awarded the Simmel award from the society, the highest award available.


Conclusion

May 3, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

Just wanted to say thanks for making it a great class this year. I enjoyed it, and I hope some of you will continue to be involved in the network field.

Grades will be posted as soon as your papers are in.

I need your titles and abstracts

April 29, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

I need your titles and abstracts for your presentations on Friday, May 1st AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 

They will be posted here:

http://www.analytictech.com/mgt780/topics/presentations.htm

Also, links to PDFs of your presentations will be posted there as well. The PDFs will live on the Google group, so they will only be accessible by class members.

Steve

Network-based dissertation defense

April 19, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

You may be interested in attending the dissertation defense of Goce Andrevski (at least the presentation part). He is looking at firm-level innovation from a network point of view. A key variable for him is structural holes. Goce is a dynamic, passionate speaker. Should be good. (I unfortunately can’t make it.)

The dissertation is entitled Competitive Strategy, Alliance Networks and Firm Performance and will be presented Monday, April 20th at 9:30 AM in the Dean’s Conference Room (Business & Economics building, Room 253).

US Secy. of Educ. values network analysis

April 19, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

Kevin Real spotted this bit in Time magazine:

[The new Education Secretary] has indicated that he will use the carrots and sticks in the stimulus bill to support voluntary efforts to write national standards and to prod states to adopt them. This process should involve advisory boards that represent employers, college admissions officers, military recruiters, teachers, education scholars and parents. It should also be ongoing, because the standards will have to evolve as the needs of the workplace and global economy do.

For example, I learned a lot of calculus, which hasn’t proved that useful in my career. But I do remember being confronted at a Time Inc. meeting on digital strategy with the simple question of how many direct two-way links there were in a fully connected network of 50 nodes. It was a long time before any of us could figure out even how to begin figuring it out. Tomorrow’s careers are likely to require more knowledge of networks, probabilities, statistics and risk analysis. That’s why it would be useful to have the standards-setting body be advised by recruitment officers from the infotech, biotech, medical and, yes, financial sectors.

 The complete article can be found here:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1891468,00.html

2-mode Conference

April 15, 2009 by Steve Borgatti
Conference and Workshop on 2-mode Social Network Analysis
VU University Amsterdam
30 September – 2 October 2009

The Department of Organization Science and the Department of Social Research Methodology at the VU University Amsterdam organize a conference and workshop which will be focusing exclusively on the analysis of 2-mode (affiliation) social network data (http://home.fsw.vu.nl/f.agneessens/2mode/overview.htm).

I. CONFERENCE (October 1-2, 2009)

By bringing together researchers with a methodological and substantive background in social network analysis, this conference aims to provide a forum to share ideas and to further the development of substantive questions on those topics, which can be studied using two-mode (or more-mode) network data.

These include:

  •   interlocking directorates,
  •   voting-behavior and cosponsorship-behavior,
  •   membership of formal and informal groups,
  •   participation to specific events,
  •   contagion of diseases among cattle through the sharing of farms,
  •   the spread of diseases through sexual contact,
  •   collaborative work among scientists and shared projects,
  •   studies related to loyalty to institutions

The Keynote Speaker will be:   Steve Borgatti (University of Kentucky)

** CALL FOR PAPERS **

Innovative papers, on topics related to how and why network ties are formed in two-mode networks, the effects that such network structures have on the actors or events, as well as other research questions involving a two-mode network approach are welcome. In addition, papers on methodological problems related to two-mode network analysis are also encouraged.

Please note the following important deadlines:

  • Deadline for abstracts: April 29th, 2009
  • Notice of acceptance: May 25th, 2009
  • Deadline for papers: August 30th, 2009
II. WORKSHOP (September 30, 2009)

In recent years a number of specific methods and programs have been developed to analyse 2-mode network data.

Preceding the conference, three different workshops will be offered. Each workshop consists of one half-day hands-on tutorial on a specific method and program. Note that the ERGM and SIENA course are at the same time, and therefore cannot be combined.

Modules:

  • Descriptive measures, techniques and visualization of two-mode data with UCINET (Steve Borgatti & Filip Agneessens)
  • Exponential random graph modelling (p*) for two-mode network data using BPNet (Peng Wang)
  • Longitudinal analysis of 2-mode network data using SIENA (Tom Snijders)

Please note that the number of places is limited and that the order will be based on date of payment received. 

For more information go to: http://home.fsw.vu.nl/f.agneessens/2mode/overview.htm or email 2MN@fsw.vu.nl.

The organizers,

Filip Agneessens
Peter Groenewegen
Gerhard van de Bunt

Dan Halgin quoted in Sloan Management Review

April 4, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

Check out this discussion of Calipari and coaching careers in general in the Sloan Management Review.

http://sloanreview.mit.edu/improvisations/2009/04/03/management-insights-from-ncaa-basketball/

The article is based on his dissertation, which can be found here:

http://www2.bc.edu/~halgin/default_files/Halgin_dissertation.pdf

Conference on 2-mode data

March 30, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

Is this cool or what? An entire conference devoted exclusively to 2-mode networks. Organized by some really sharp people. And a great excuse to visit Amsterdam. For more info, here’s the conference url:

http://home.fsw.vu.nl/f.agneessens/2mode/overview.htm

The conference includes several workshops.

Quick overview of network analysis for a reporter

March 4, 2009 by Steve Borgatti

Hi, I understand you are looking for a high-level description of UCINET and what it is used for.

Given network data (such as who is kin of whom, who is boss of whom, who talks to whom, how gives money to whom, etc) the program computes a bunch of metrics that illuminate the structural role played by individual nodes in the network (or specific relationships, or entire groups).

So, for example, it can model the expected amount of information that is flowing through the network that will reach a certain node, and model when it will receive it. Typical guiding theoretical principle is that nodes that are more central in the network (in various different senses), have certain advantage over other nodes, which enables us to predict that they will perform better than others, or get more rewards, or will increase in status/power. Etc. At the same time, we can estimate which nodes will do the most damage on removal from a network, in terms of damaging that network’s abilities to transmit information and orders.

 Academic Research. At the most general level, UCINET is used to investigate two kinds of questions: (a) variation in performance/success, and (b) homogeneity in attitudes, beliefs and behaviors.

 Research into the first question can be broadly termed social capital research – it is about the benefits of social ties and social positions and ultimately network structure. It answers the question, what does it get you to be located where you are in a network that has a certain structure. So classical work on how people get ahead, how do you get jobs, who’s got the power, why are some more creative than others, etc are all part of this research stream/. 

Research into the second question can be broadly termed diffusion or peer influence research. It is about how one’s beliefs, attitudes, practices, and so on are shaped by the people (or other entities) we interact with. Classical work on language acquisition, becoming a criminal, fashion and consumer marketing, politics, and so on part of this research stream.

Applied Research. All of the academic work has obvious implications for many applied fields – for example, the diffusion research is key to shaping how pharmaceutical companies identify physician “key opinion leaders” and try to influence the influencers. But I would say that there are three well-developed applied SNA areas: criminology/terrorism, public health, management consulting.

 Criminology/terrorism. A key goal here is breaking up criminal networks – “whack-a-mole” type applications where you try to figure out which are the key players such that removing them from the network (i.e., arresting, shooting, discrediting) would do the most damage to the network’s ability to cause problems for others. In this area, much of the work is directed toward figuring out how to obtain the network data in the first place, since the terrorists won’t fill out surveys. Essentially, the problem they have is way too little good data (e.g., who trusts whom, reliably measures) and way too much bad data (terabytes of data linking people to others in highly circumstantial and unreliable ways).

 Management Consulting. The goals here are usually the opposite the criminology goals. Here you want to strengthen the network and help it accomplish its goals more efficiently. The network analysis done by UCINET can be used in a number of ways. For example, in the case of post-merger integration (PMI), you have two companies merging not only their technologies, but their cultures and their people (and with them, their networks). A network analysis quickly tells you where the networks are integrating and where they are still remaining apart. You can also use UCINET to discover key nodes who (a) should be given a strong stake in the company because they would leave a large hole if they left, and (b) have the “network signatures” of future stars, and should be groomed  for promotion, and (c) maybe bottlenecks because they are so good that too much is getting channeled their way, and the system is become slow and brittle (when he has cold, everything grinds to a halt).

 Health. The goals here a combination of the criminology and management consulting goals. On the epidemiological side, you have a contagious disease that is spreading from person to person. By doing a network analysis, you can figure out which individuals (or collectivities) need to be immunized/quarantined in order to slow the spread of the disease as much as possible. This is the same problem as the stopping of a terrorist network problem. On the other side, there is the patient care side, in which patients get the care they need by having helpful and knowledgeable friends that are either doctors themselves, or are good at asking questions of doctors, or who can provide good referrals, etc. Also patients who are able to connect their various specialists so that they talk to each to each other can achieve much better outcomes for themselves.